Anarchore
2007-12-05 15:24:57 UTC
Well at last the press is starting to notice the effects of mass
immigration and are calling it what it is --a flood, a deluge that
threatens to drown us in foriegn babbling, opportunistic and ruthless
squat brown beasts.
Even if the immigration were European it would be too much, and would
cause problems. The numbers are driving up the cost of living and the
savages amoung them are turning the cities into crime infested slums.
1 in 5 in Canada is foriegn born, and 60% of those come from Asia, the
CBC radio news reported. But the Jew-led CBC is not concerned about
the 'changing face of Canada', and report on any negative impact, and
whether perhaps it is not that great an idea to import over 300,000
foreigners a year. They just report it like it was the weather, and we
have no control over it.
In fact they repeat the lies of the business community that say we need
immigrants.
So what happens when the people of Canada are told they are powerless
to fight this?
They start to wonder if perhaps the maligned European heritage
organizations, and those warning of Jewish conspiracies(labelled as
'Nazis' by the Jewish controlled media) were right all along, as it
appears the situation is totally out of our hands.
We see the strife of immigration in France, Holland, Germany and other
European countries, but we are told it is natural and just to wait
until Canada turns into a shithole.
With no other options, many Canadians are turning to sites like
stormfront.org to seek ways to protect their heritage, and then find
out that the Jews were lying all along about Nazis, and instead find
other Canadians like themselves who have finally had enough.
http://www.stormfront.org/forum/forumdisplay.php/stormfront-canada-40.html
http://canadianpress.google.com/article/ALeqM5gA8zvyB5z-SkNElqmvcOA6dxa8uw
Flood of immigrants causing strain on Canada's largest cities
1 day ago
TORONTO - Canada's three largest cities are struggling to cope with a
flood of newcomers primarily from China, India, the Philippines and
Pakistan as immigration approaches levels not seen since the end of the
"Great Migration."
Statistics Canada said Tuesday that 69 per cent of recent immigrants to
Canada resided in the "magnet" or "gateway" cities of Montreal, Toronto
and Vancouver - dubbed MTV - in 2006. That's down from 73 per cent in
2001 and 74 per cent in 1996.
Still, 97 per cent of all immigrants in the last five years ended up in
large urban areas.
The flood of immigrants has resulted in the kind of vibrant,
diversification celebrated as the essence of Canadian multiculturalism.
But it has also created a nation of two solitudes: declining rural
populations at the same time as bulging big cities struggle to provide
services newcomers rely on.
Despite the enormous social, political and economic ramifications of
immigration - forecast to be the single source of population growth in
Canada within 30 years - public and political discourse on the subject
seems muted.
"Canadians, according to surveys, think that there may be some major
problems with immigration but they're constantly told that we need it
anyway," said Martin Collacott, a former Canadian ambassador and now
senior fellow with the Fraser Institute in Vancouver.
"You don't really question immigration because you'll be a racist if
you do."
Debatable policy issues include the number of immigrants Canada accepts
along with the hundreds of millions of dollars spent each year helping
them settle. There are also the issues of what kind of immigrant is
allowed to enter - family class or skilled, for example, as well as
where they should settle.
For politicians competing for the "ethnic" vote in a country built on
immigrants, those are thorny questions some would rather leave
untouched.
In the late 1980s and early 1990s, the federal government floated the
idea of directing new arrivals to the hinterland to address the issues
of stressed urban services, immigrant concentration and rural
depopulation.
The idea died a quiet death and has since been replaced by federal and
provincial efforts to "encourage" immigrants to settle in
less-trafficked centres.
In 2006, only five per cent of the immigrant population lived in a
rural area, Statistics Canada reported.
One innovation, said Tim Vail, spokesman for federal Immigration
Minister Diane Finley, was the removal of a federal cap on how many
newcomers provinces can accept, which has allowed smaller provinces to
be more aggressive in recruiting immigrants on their own terms.
Setting aside constitutional concerns, experts say forcing immigrants
to settle outside large urban centres simply doesn't work.
"It's not valuable. It's very clear: even if people say they're going
to live in Lethbridge, Alta., or Saskatchewan, they pull up eventually
and they move to where they think the jobs and where the families are,"
said Monica Boyd, a sociology professor at the University of Toronto
who studied the subject.
"You cannot keep people in place very long if in fact they perceive the
opportunities elsewhere."
Quebec, which has enjoyed a large amount of autonomy in selecting its
immigrants for the past 16 years, recorded its highest population of
foreign-born in 2006 at 11.5 per cent of the population.
The province shifted to a more regionalized strategy about two years
ago to ensure immigrants "establish themselves everywhere," said
Yolande James, Quebec's immigration minister.
The approach relies on promoting the province's regions abroad and
closely matching immigrant skills to available jobs on the premise that
a happily employed newcomer is more likely to stay in place.
The strategy, which begins during the selection interview abroad, is
starting to bear fruit.
The census shows that while 87 per cent of Quebec's foreign-born
residents lived in Montreal there was also an increase in the number of
immigrants settling in other areas, including Quebec City,
Ottawa-Gatineau and Sherbrooke.
Amy Casipullai, policy co-ordinator of Ontario Council of Agencies
Serving Immigrants, said immigration is no panacea for rural
depopulation.
"If Canada doesn't deal with the problem of flight from small towns for
the Canadian-born population, then how are you going to convince
immigrants that this is actually a worthwhile move for them?"
Casipullai said.
Charles Cirtwill, acting president of the Atlantic Institute for Market
Studies, said smaller provinces should focus efforts on growing their
existing immigrant bases.
"For example, here in Halifax we have a lot of Middle Eastern
immigrants, so why are we spending so much time trying to draw a
Chinese community here when we've already got a basis to build on?"
Cirtwill said.
Big cities complain they are left on the hook for providing the vital
services that help immigrants feel at home - social housing; libraries;
community, recreation and public-health programs and schools.
"We don't get a nickel from the federal government to support the kind
of services that actually help people settle successfully in this
city," said Toronto Mayor David Miller, where 46 per cent of the city's
population was foreign-born in 2006.
"(But) if we don't properly support newcomers . . . there can well be
problems."
The complaint is similar in Vancouver.
"We lack the resources most of the time to be really proactive," said
Baldwin Wong, a social planner with the city of Vancouver, where 40 per
cent of all residents were born abroad and have a mother tongue other
than English or French.
"We do have, for example, four multilingual phone lines - but that's
only four language groups that we can address rather than the 60 or 70
different types of languages that are spoken in Vancouver schools."
Ontario Immigration Minister Michael Chan said the province, which gets
half the country's immigrants, spent about $160 million on services for
newcomers last year although he complains that Ottawa has shortchanged
the province in promised support.
Where in the province immigrants go is a "personal" choice, Chan said.
The census shows 69 per cent of Ontario's foreign-born chose the
Toronto area, with suburbs such as Brampton, Mississauga picking up an
increasing amount of immigrants.
Experts say the bright lights of the metropolis are an irresistible
lure for newcomers for two main reasons: economic diversity and social
networks.
Newcomers to Montreal also cited language while those settling in
Vancouver noted the climate, the census showed.
Many big-city schools, which are the point of entry into Canadian
society for most immigrant children, are staggering under the weight of
large numbers of students needing language training and other
specialized guidance.
Marcel Tremblay, an executive member of Montreal's council, said the
city wants immigrants to help bulk up its population, but the $1.5
million it gets from the province for services for newcomers is
"peanuts."
John Campey, executive director of the Community Social Planning
Council of Toronto, said governments have made attracting immigrants a
priority, but sadly not the money to support them.
"Investing in new arrivals in Canada has not been at the top of their
list."
immigration and are calling it what it is --a flood, a deluge that
threatens to drown us in foriegn babbling, opportunistic and ruthless
squat brown beasts.
Even if the immigration were European it would be too much, and would
cause problems. The numbers are driving up the cost of living and the
savages amoung them are turning the cities into crime infested slums.
1 in 5 in Canada is foriegn born, and 60% of those come from Asia, the
CBC radio news reported. But the Jew-led CBC is not concerned about
the 'changing face of Canada', and report on any negative impact, and
whether perhaps it is not that great an idea to import over 300,000
foreigners a year. They just report it like it was the weather, and we
have no control over it.
In fact they repeat the lies of the business community that say we need
immigrants.
So what happens when the people of Canada are told they are powerless
to fight this?
They start to wonder if perhaps the maligned European heritage
organizations, and those warning of Jewish conspiracies(labelled as
'Nazis' by the Jewish controlled media) were right all along, as it
appears the situation is totally out of our hands.
We see the strife of immigration in France, Holland, Germany and other
European countries, but we are told it is natural and just to wait
until Canada turns into a shithole.
With no other options, many Canadians are turning to sites like
stormfront.org to seek ways to protect their heritage, and then find
out that the Jews were lying all along about Nazis, and instead find
other Canadians like themselves who have finally had enough.
http://www.stormfront.org/forum/forumdisplay.php/stormfront-canada-40.html
http://canadianpress.google.com/article/ALeqM5gA8zvyB5z-SkNElqmvcOA6dxa8uw
Flood of immigrants causing strain on Canada's largest cities
1 day ago
TORONTO - Canada's three largest cities are struggling to cope with a
flood of newcomers primarily from China, India, the Philippines and
Pakistan as immigration approaches levels not seen since the end of the
"Great Migration."
Statistics Canada said Tuesday that 69 per cent of recent immigrants to
Canada resided in the "magnet" or "gateway" cities of Montreal, Toronto
and Vancouver - dubbed MTV - in 2006. That's down from 73 per cent in
2001 and 74 per cent in 1996.
Still, 97 per cent of all immigrants in the last five years ended up in
large urban areas.
The flood of immigrants has resulted in the kind of vibrant,
diversification celebrated as the essence of Canadian multiculturalism.
But it has also created a nation of two solitudes: declining rural
populations at the same time as bulging big cities struggle to provide
services newcomers rely on.
Despite the enormous social, political and economic ramifications of
immigration - forecast to be the single source of population growth in
Canada within 30 years - public and political discourse on the subject
seems muted.
"Canadians, according to surveys, think that there may be some major
problems with immigration but they're constantly told that we need it
anyway," said Martin Collacott, a former Canadian ambassador and now
senior fellow with the Fraser Institute in Vancouver.
"You don't really question immigration because you'll be a racist if
you do."
Debatable policy issues include the number of immigrants Canada accepts
along with the hundreds of millions of dollars spent each year helping
them settle. There are also the issues of what kind of immigrant is
allowed to enter - family class or skilled, for example, as well as
where they should settle.
For politicians competing for the "ethnic" vote in a country built on
immigrants, those are thorny questions some would rather leave
untouched.
In the late 1980s and early 1990s, the federal government floated the
idea of directing new arrivals to the hinterland to address the issues
of stressed urban services, immigrant concentration and rural
depopulation.
The idea died a quiet death and has since been replaced by federal and
provincial efforts to "encourage" immigrants to settle in
less-trafficked centres.
In 2006, only five per cent of the immigrant population lived in a
rural area, Statistics Canada reported.
One innovation, said Tim Vail, spokesman for federal Immigration
Minister Diane Finley, was the removal of a federal cap on how many
newcomers provinces can accept, which has allowed smaller provinces to
be more aggressive in recruiting immigrants on their own terms.
Setting aside constitutional concerns, experts say forcing immigrants
to settle outside large urban centres simply doesn't work.
"It's not valuable. It's very clear: even if people say they're going
to live in Lethbridge, Alta., or Saskatchewan, they pull up eventually
and they move to where they think the jobs and where the families are,"
said Monica Boyd, a sociology professor at the University of Toronto
who studied the subject.
"You cannot keep people in place very long if in fact they perceive the
opportunities elsewhere."
Quebec, which has enjoyed a large amount of autonomy in selecting its
immigrants for the past 16 years, recorded its highest population of
foreign-born in 2006 at 11.5 per cent of the population.
The province shifted to a more regionalized strategy about two years
ago to ensure immigrants "establish themselves everywhere," said
Yolande James, Quebec's immigration minister.
The approach relies on promoting the province's regions abroad and
closely matching immigrant skills to available jobs on the premise that
a happily employed newcomer is more likely to stay in place.
The strategy, which begins during the selection interview abroad, is
starting to bear fruit.
The census shows that while 87 per cent of Quebec's foreign-born
residents lived in Montreal there was also an increase in the number of
immigrants settling in other areas, including Quebec City,
Ottawa-Gatineau and Sherbrooke.
Amy Casipullai, policy co-ordinator of Ontario Council of Agencies
Serving Immigrants, said immigration is no panacea for rural
depopulation.
"If Canada doesn't deal with the problem of flight from small towns for
the Canadian-born population, then how are you going to convince
immigrants that this is actually a worthwhile move for them?"
Casipullai said.
Charles Cirtwill, acting president of the Atlantic Institute for Market
Studies, said smaller provinces should focus efforts on growing their
existing immigrant bases.
"For example, here in Halifax we have a lot of Middle Eastern
immigrants, so why are we spending so much time trying to draw a
Chinese community here when we've already got a basis to build on?"
Cirtwill said.
Big cities complain they are left on the hook for providing the vital
services that help immigrants feel at home - social housing; libraries;
community, recreation and public-health programs and schools.
"We don't get a nickel from the federal government to support the kind
of services that actually help people settle successfully in this
city," said Toronto Mayor David Miller, where 46 per cent of the city's
population was foreign-born in 2006.
"(But) if we don't properly support newcomers . . . there can well be
problems."
The complaint is similar in Vancouver.
"We lack the resources most of the time to be really proactive," said
Baldwin Wong, a social planner with the city of Vancouver, where 40 per
cent of all residents were born abroad and have a mother tongue other
than English or French.
"We do have, for example, four multilingual phone lines - but that's
only four language groups that we can address rather than the 60 or 70
different types of languages that are spoken in Vancouver schools."
Ontario Immigration Minister Michael Chan said the province, which gets
half the country's immigrants, spent about $160 million on services for
newcomers last year although he complains that Ottawa has shortchanged
the province in promised support.
Where in the province immigrants go is a "personal" choice, Chan said.
The census shows 69 per cent of Ontario's foreign-born chose the
Toronto area, with suburbs such as Brampton, Mississauga picking up an
increasing amount of immigrants.
Experts say the bright lights of the metropolis are an irresistible
lure for newcomers for two main reasons: economic diversity and social
networks.
Newcomers to Montreal also cited language while those settling in
Vancouver noted the climate, the census showed.
Many big-city schools, which are the point of entry into Canadian
society for most immigrant children, are staggering under the weight of
large numbers of students needing language training and other
specialized guidance.
Marcel Tremblay, an executive member of Montreal's council, said the
city wants immigrants to help bulk up its population, but the $1.5
million it gets from the province for services for newcomers is
"peanuts."
John Campey, executive director of the Community Social Planning
Council of Toronto, said governments have made attracting immigrants a
priority, but sadly not the money to support them.
"Investing in new arrivals in Canada has not been at the top of their
list."